|
Teleradiology is by far the most common telemedicine
application. There are at least 10, and more likely 15 or more, diagnostic
teleradiology cases for each interactive video patient-clinician consultation.
Not only is there a lot of teleradiology activity, as shown in this
issues review of teleradiology service providers; there is also a fair
amount of money being spent on teleradiology equipment. A recent Frost &
Sullivan estimate placed the 1996 world sales of teleradiology products at
about $89 million. If PACS were considered in the equation, this figure would
obviously be much higher.
To find out where the teleradiology industry is right
now and what to expect for 1998, we surveyed the 52 vendors we consider to be
leaders, by dint of market share or cutting-edge reputation. The survey was
administered by phone, FAX, email, and via our Web-based questionnaire. We
present here the responses we received.
This years big news is the development, at long
last, of filmless direct digital imaging (DDI) technology. This is a full
generation beyond the old "phosphor plate" direct acquisition technology used
in (for example) CT scans. To explain this technology is beyond the scope of
this article. However, you should start getting used to the words at the heart
of this breakthrough: "amorphous silicon x-ray detectors". The DDI electronic
plates cover the same area as a standard adult x-ray cassette (14" x 17"; to 41
cm x 41 cm), with a matrix of 2560 x 3072 elements each capable of 16-bit
contrast and with a pixel pitch as low as 100 microns. This last feature is
extremely important since it will probably allow these panels to be used for
mammography, which has the technological requirement of being able to detect
100 micron microcalcifications (cf. Telemammography Feasibility, Vol. 4,
no.6). The advantages of direct-to-digital image capture are obvious and
numerous:
* elimination of film and processing chemicals *
no film-processing delays * direct accession of images to PACS and
teleradiology * eliminates need for expensive film digitizers
Two companies have announced DDI products: GE
Medical Systems and Sterling Diagnostic Imaging. Both have real products that
have been undergoing extensive testing at university hospitals in the U.S.
Their booths will likely be mobbed at RSNA. Neither company could commit to a
price for their DDI product, nor to a specific availability time.
Other important trends:
* wavelets is becoming recognized as the best way to
compress images with the least data loss. 10:1 compression can be attained,
compared to the standard 3:1 for lossless JPEG compression (see Vol. 3, no.
2, p. 28). It is used in products from Access Radiology, EMED, and
Sterling.
* Internet compatibility is increasingly a feature of
teleradiology systems, enabling platform-independent transmission of images
anywhere in the world. This is a feature of products from Acuson, Analogic,
EMED, KLTs ViewSend, Siemens, and ViTel Net.
* nearly every product is (or claims to be) DICOM 3.0
compliant. As Dave Swartz has emphasized in his TechTalk column (Introducing
DICOM 3.0: A Standard for Medical Imaging; Vol. 5, no. 1), DICOM is an
extremely complex standard, with multiple protocols and specifications. No
product could conform to all DICOM standards, and any claim of conformance
needs to be evaluated in light of your specific needs.
* the default standard for teleradiology and PACS
server operating systems appears to be Windows NT.
* voice recognition still has only one player in the
field (IBMs MedSpeak/Radiology). This should change in the next year,
since several companies (Dragon Speak; Kurzweil) now have continuous voice
recognition products.
Finally, there is a natural, increasing convergence
of PACS and teleradiology technology. For example, it is becoming more common
for off-site teleradiology studies to be ported directly into the PACS system
(as happens now, for example, with Bostons VA Hospital teleradiology/PACS
system) where they can be called up by radiologists in the central reading
room. The lines of distinction should continue to blur over the coming
year.
All Rights Reserved
Telemedicine Today Magazine |