|
Correspondent: Leonid Malkov, Editor, Computer
Technology in Medicine (Russian language magazine);Vice President, ParaGraph
International. U.S. phone: 408/364-770; malkov@paragraph.com. With Lia
Belenkova.
There are some interesting similarities between
Russian and U.S. telemedicine. Both have grown up with and been shaped by the
space program, and both are to a great extent driven by serious problems with
access to medical expertise in rural areas.
The technology developed for transmitting medical
information from space stations and spaceships to earth was used extensively
after the Armenian earthquake of 1988, and after the Ufa gas pipeline explosion
in 1989, in which many people were injured. Currently the Russian Center for
Space Biomedicine (which is in fact a telemedicine center), Moscow State
University, and the Institute of Medical Biological Investigation are
collaborating with NASA through an agreement by the Gore-Chernomyrdin
Commission. Among other things, this collaboration includes creation of several
Silicon Graphics workstations for medically related video sessions between
hospital in Russia and the U.S.
The Russian Republic and all of the former Soviet
states have very underdeveloped telecommunications infrastructures, and do not
have the capital resources to improve this situation. Fortunately, in 1992 an
American financier, George Soros, donated $100 million to support science in
the countries of the former Soviet Union. One of the outcomes of this has been
development of a University-based Internet project, tasked with creating a new
generation of Internet users. The first University Center opened in June, 1996
in Yaroslavl; the second will open soon in Novosibirsk. In all, 32 regional
universities will be linked. Also, the South Moscow Supportive Network (SMSN)
is being upgraded to fiber and will support 100Mbps transmission. The SMSN is
essentially a Wide Area Network and provides Internet access and computer
networking for leading medical, scientific, and educational institutions in
Moscow and St. Petersburg. The SMSN is currently an interesting hybrid network
consisting of four data channels. Two of these operate via satellite, which
allows very high throughput but suffers problems with dependability and delay
in signal passage. The other channels are land based. Access to the SMSN trunk
is via regular phone lines or via ISDN lines for higher-end users. Another
network under development is the RUNET (Russian University Network), financed
by the Ministry of Science, that will presumably link with and extend the
SMSN.
The Russian telemedical community feels strongly that
development of the telecommunications infrastructure is crucial for advancement
of telemedicine. Not only does it support "low-end" telemedicine applications
like Web-based medical education, still image archiving and distribution for
modalities such as telepathology, and passage of email and medical records. It
also raises professional and public awareness of the potential contribution of
telecommunications to patient care, and opens the gates to perceiving the
potential of "high-end" applications such as interactive teleconsultations.
Many Russian telemedicine applications are now POTS (Plain Old Telephone
System)-based, but even that is hampered by the fact that the quality of many
of these lines is poor, and cannot reliably support high speed, unbroken modem
data links.
Satellite-mediated applications have been piloted in
Russia, most prominently several international case conferences via the
International Telebridge. These have typically run at 128 Kbps, and have linked
the Department of Medical Science at Moscow State University to Baylor College
of Medicine (Houston, TX) in the U.S. and to University Hospital of
Troms¯, Norway. Other links have been to telemedicine centers in Moscow,
Novosibirsk, and Ekaterinburg. While screen resolution for these conferences
was high, the low bandwidth made for poor motion handling, and satellite
transmission delays of up to three seconds have made true interactivity a
challenge. The screen resolution of transmitted radiographs and pathology
slides appears to be adequate, at least for teaching purposes.
Elsewhere throughout the countries of the former
Soviet Union, telecommunications and telemedicine infrastructure is being
supported by the American International Health Alliance (AIHA -
http://solar.rtd.utk.edu/friends/health/aiha/aihadir/AIHADIR.HTM), which has
the mission of improving ties between medical systems in the U.S. and in the
newly independent states. For example, in the past year there have been eight
teleconferences between Boston U. School of Medicine and hospitals in Yerevan,
Armenia using Winrad technology and VTEL equipment.
A regular link has been established between Arkangelsk
Medical Academy in northwestern Russia and Troms¯ Regional Hospital in
northern Norway, using regular phone lines and modems as well as periodic
higher-bandwidth digital links. This has been used both for patient care and
for teaching. Telemedicine in this extremely northern part of Russia is seen as
a high priority because of the high costs of transporting patients for
specialty care, especially in the winter.
On a more local level, the Moscow office of Paragraph
International is developing a new kind of cardiac monitor which enables ECG
transmission over regular phone lines
(http://russia.paragraph.com/mobile/mobile.htm) directly from patient homes,
using palm-top computers.
An indicator of the perceived importance of
telemedicine in Russia is the development of a new curriculum and
specialization in telemedicine at the Arkangelsk Medical Academy.
Conclusion
Russian telemedicine is at an important crossroads.
The need is clear, and professional enthusiasm is high. There are two major
factors determining growth over the next few years: first, whether the federal
government decides truly to commit to health care as a national priority; and
second, whether the telecommunications infrastructure is developed enough that
it can adequately support reliable, timely transfer of large amounts of medical
data. |