Telemedecine Today
 
Telemedicine Today
The Magazine
    About
Telemedicine
Today
 
      Articles  
      Article
References
 
      Business
Briefs
 
      Dialogue  
      News Links  
      Past Issues  
      Product Info  
      Subscriptions  
Resources
      Search  
      State Law
Guide
 
      Glossary  
      Conference
Calendar
 
      Extras  
Contact Us
      Subscriptions  
      Advertising  
      Editorial
Submissions
 
      Customer
Service
 
      Webmaster  
   
A "What If" Scenario For Telemedicine Reimbursement Based on ATSP/TT Survey Findings
 

Fran Fields

Fran Fields is the market analyst for Feedback Research Services, specializing in forecasts for emerging segments of the health care industry.

In any business model for telemedicine, health care professionals must be paid for providing teleconsultations. Reimbursement has been a constant issue in recent years, with industry concerns focusing on the levels and types of payments that are appropriate for government programs, insurance coverage, and managed care plans. No one knows how much compensation physicians and specialists are currently receiving throughout the United States for their telemedicine-mediated services. Historically, there has been little, if any, documentation for claims processing. Even in California (where reimbursement legislation has been enacted for two years now), the first telemedicine claims processed by the Department of Health Services were only paid out in August 1998.

In the absence of real data, applying extrapolation techniques to ATSP/Telemedicine Today survey results can provide preliminary estimates of income potential. Rounded figures for teleconsultation volumes have been used here. The fee amount is more speculative. A rate of $300 per hour was cited on the New England Medical Center Web site in mid-1996, and this figure is probably a good, conservative estimate for fees paid to specialists for a single telemedicine consultation. Higher rates have been proposed by the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), such as a $410 fee split between consulting and referring physicians. It is more likely, however, that the types of services reported in the survey were not typically first-time specialty consults. Therefore, they would have involved a much lower aggregate average charge (perhaps $100).

Using a conservative $100 payment rate per teleconsultation, and rounded ATSP/TT numbers from the 1998 survey of consultation activity among 139 U.S. programs in 1997, the following estimates can be generated:

Teleconsultation Category # of Teleconsultations Potential professional fees

Mental Health				7,400			    $ 740,000

CARDIOLOGY                            6,200                         $ 620,000

Orthopedics			       2,400			    $ 240,000

Dermatology                                2,300                               $ 230,000

Ophthalmology                             4,000                               $ 400,000

Internal Medicine                          2,000                               $ 200,000

Other                                         17,400_                           $ 1,740,000

Total:                                         41,700                             $ 4,170,000

Teleconsultation Data: 1998 Report on U.S. Telemedicine Activity, ATSP/Telemedicine Today, Portland, OR (www.atsp.org). Also reported in Telemedicine Today, Vol. 6, no. 5, 1998 (5th Annual Program Survey: Consultation Activity in 35 Specialties).

Analysis: Feedback Research Services

This same methodology can also be applied to projected total teleconsultations of 58,000 for 1998 (based on first quarter ATSP survey data), resulting in an estimate of $5.8 million in professional fees.

For comparison, it is interesting to review projections presented by HCFA in the December 4, 1997 Letter Report Prepared for Al Gore, Jr., President of the Senate. Different criteria were used for the HCFA calculations, but a reasonable expectation is that Medicare reimbursement should represent a fraction of the total attributable to all telemedicine consultations. Using payment method parameters specified in the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (not to exceed "current fee schedule amounts"), cost estimates of $19.0 million were projected for 1999 for patients who are eligible according to the proposed rules (e.g., those residing in Health Professional Shortage Areas, etc.). If eligibility were extended to include patients in all rural areas, the HCFA cost estimate for 1999 was calculated to be $270 million.

Based on the ATSP survey data and the analysis shown above describing all known teleconsultations ($4.2 million in 1997 and $5.8 million in 1998), both HCFA projections appear to be extremely high. Even applying $410 per teleconsultation (a "first-time specialty" rate) results in an estimate of only $23.8 million for all teleconsultations projected for 1998. Using a growth rate of 39% in 1999 (the same rate projected for 1998) generates an estimate of 80,620 teleconsultations and $33.1 million (at $410 per teleconsultation). For perspective, the HCFA projection of $19.0 million would represent 57% of this $33.1 million forecast for 1999. Although there may be discrepancies due to variations in methodologies and definitions, the Medicare reimbursement numbers therefore seem inconsistent with total telemedicine service volumes analyzed to date.

To obtain the "1998 Report on U.S. Telemedicine Activity" contact: Pat.Wittenberg@atsp.org; 503/222-2406; www.atsp.org.

   
© 2001-2002 - B2BMedia Inc.